Index / A27

A27

A27 — alkaline, 12 V, 8 x 28.2 mm. Current, and nothing else in the data shares its size.

What fits the compartment, and what does not

Fit answers whether it enters the compartment. Voltage answers whether the circuit will notice. A cell that fits is not always a safe substitute.

Nothing Energizer still lists is the same depth. The one option below shares the diameter and stands 42.5 mm against this cell's 28.2, and every one of them is deeper than this cell, so the question is not the contact but the cover: a deeper cell goes into the opening and stops the lid closing.

The thinnest rung of its diameter

This is the thinnest coin cell made at 8 mm across, 28.2 mm deep. The 3 other cells at this diameter are all taller, up to 42.5 mm, which means the swap runs one way only: they will not go where this one fits.

What this cell can stand in for

2 designations Energizer no longer lists point at this cell as the closest thing it does list, and for 2 of them it is a different voltage class: the gap reaches 87.5%. For those it is not a substitution — read the voltage column before the fit column.

Every column of a row describes the discontinued cell it names. Fit reads that way too: it says whether that cell would enter this compartment, not whether this one enters its. Voltage is measured against this cell, the same way everywhere on the page: each row shows the discontinued cell’s own voltage and how far that voltage sits from this one.

Several cells in one can, and what that costs

This is not one cell. It is a stack sealed in one can, which is why the voltage is a multiple and the diameter is not. A27 at 12 V is 8 cells of 1.5 V in series.

A series stack is only as good as its worst cell. One weak element takes the whole can down, and nothing on the outside shows which one it was. The unit inside is the same width as LR41 and 193, a single 1.5 V cell of this diameter. Published capacity 22 mAh for the whole stack, not per cell: capacity does not add in series, voltage does.

• 1 cell measures close enough to compare against it in the Energizer data this site reads, and 1 of it is still listed.
• The nearest is LR8D425: it goes in and stands too tall and runs 1.5 V, wrong class.
• Energizer files it for Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America and North America, which is where the part is sold rather than where the cell will work.
• The maker still lists it, under 1 product line: A27.

Drawn to scale

Every published figure

9 figures are published and 3 fields left blank, among them volume, energy density and impedance. It reaches shelves as A27.

1 row in the table is not the maker's but ours: stored energy. Everything else is reproduced without change.

Where the capacity figure stops counting

A capacity figure means nothing without the voltage it was counted to. For A27 the maker counts down to 6 V, and 1 published figure sits beside it.

Capacity and voltage together put 264 milliwatt-hours in that space. Energizer files it for Asia Pacific, Europe and Latin America.

Cutoff voltage

6 V. The published capacity is counted down to this voltage; a device that quits higher up sees less than the whole figure.

Where the part is filed

Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America and North America. That is a statement about the maker's distribution and not about where the cell works.

Is that a lot of energy?

Nothing else measured shares this shell, so the comparison has to go site-wide: 264 milliwatt-hours in not published cubic centimeters is 0 mWh per cc, denser than 0% of every cell measured here. Density is ours: the maker publishes capacity and volume and never divides one by the other.

A width the catalog keeps returning to

8 mm is a width this catalog keeps coming back to: 3 cylinders sit within half a millimeter of it, A27 included.

• LR8D425 — 8.3 x 42.5 mm, 1.5 V, alkaline.
• 3-0316 — 7.8 x 39.8 mm, 1.5 V, alkaline.
• 3-0316I — 8.2 x 39.8 mm, 1.5 V, alkaline.
• 1 of those one is still listed. 2 of the 69 cylinders share its 12 V exactly.

The names on the package that are not designations

A27 answers to 2 markings outside the standard: 27A and MN27. A retail trade marking, not an iec designation, and no standards body stands behind any of them, which is why none is printed under Also stamped above.

• 27A — a retail trade marking, not an IEC designation.
• MN27 — a retail trade marking, not an IEC designation.

The cell that differs only in depth

The code says the size, so the cells that get confused with A27 are the ones that keep its diameter and change its depth. 3 cells share this diameter at depths from 39.8 to 42.5 mm, and every one of them enters the same opening.

It stands 1 of 1 in this envelope by stored energy. On a scale the difference shows before it shows on a caliper: this one weighs 4.4 g.

• 3-0316 — same diameter, 39.8 mm tall against this cell's 28.2: 11.6 mm deeper, which neither designation carries.
• 3-0316I — same diameter, 39.8 mm tall against this cell's 28.2: 11.6 mm deeper, which neither designation carries.
• LR8D425 — same diameter, 42.5 mm tall against this cell's 28.2: 14.3 mm deeper, which neither designation carries.

What this page cannot tell you

3 of the 7 fields this site reads are empty for A27: volume, impedance and operating temperature. Everything computed from them is absent from this page rather than estimated.

The blanks are the same in all 2 records behind this designation, so they are the catalog's silence and not a merge losing a value. What is not missing is the envelope: 8 x 28.2 mm, published and checked against the designation itself.

• No volume — so this page cannot tell you energy per cubic centimeter, which is how cells of different shapes are compared here.
• No impedance — so this page cannot tell you whether the cell can drive a pulse, which is the whole question in a watch or a sensor.
• No operating temperature — so this page cannot tell you whether the maker claims anything at all below freezing.

Before you swap anything

Everything here is computed from published dimensions and nominal voltages. That answers whether a cell enters the compartment and whether the voltage matches on paper. It does not answer what your device does with the difference, and it cannot: a cell that fits can still be the wrong cell.

One more limit, and it is the biggest. This site reads a single manufacturer’s catalog. When a page says a designation is not listed, that means Energizer no longer offers a part under it — not that nobody makes the cell. Other makers may still sell it, and for common sizes they usually do.

A voltage difference is one relation between two cells, and this page prints it from the cell it is about — in every table on the page, including the one listing cells no longer made. A figure always belongs to the cell whose voltage is printed beside it: a cell that runs lower than this one carries a minus here, one that runs higher carries a plus, and two cells at the same nominal voltage carry zero. Meet the same pair on the other cell’s page and the sign is the other one, with the figure taken against that cell instead of this one; where the two run at the same voltage, both pages print zero. The class beside the figure is not read off that figure directly. It is decided on the gap itself, taken against the higher of the two nominal voltages, so one pair of cells gets one class whichever page you meet it on: counted from this side the boundary of the class that still runs falls at 20.0% below and 25.0% above, which is the same gap divided once by the larger nominal and once by the smaller. What genuinely differs between the two directions is the consequence, and the words carry it: a cell that runs low makes a calibrated instrument read below true, and a cell that runs high makes it read above.

3 things this site cannot see. Whether the contacts reach a shorter cell. Whether the device was calibrated for a chemistry that holds its voltage flat, which silver oxide does and alkaline does not. Whether the equipment tolerates the higher current a different chemistry can deliver. Rechargeable cells are never a drop-in for primary cells regardless of size.

Cells measured next to this one

Nothing in the Energizer data on this site shares this exact size. The 3 cells below have the same diameter and a different depth — 39.8 to 42.5 mm against this cell's 28.2 — which is a near miss rather than an alternative.

• 3-0316 — 7.8 x 39.8 mm, 1.5 V
• 3-0316I — 8.2 x 39.8 mm, 1.5 V
• LR8D425 — 8.3 x 42.5 mm, 1.5 V

Where these numbers come from

Dimensions, voltages, chemistries and capacities are published by the manufacturer and reproduced without change. Everything else on the page is ours, computed from those figures: whether one cell fits where another sat, how far apart their voltages are, stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter, the rank within a shell, and the check of the designation against the measured size.

Fit is decided within 0.3 mm on every axis, which is the order of a contact spring's travel. Voltage classes are decided by consequence, not by roundness, and they are decided on the gap between two nominal voltages taken against the higher of the two: 2.0% or less of it is the same working voltage, 6.0% starts to matter to a calibrated instrument, and past 20.0% it is a different class altogether. Measuring the gap against the higher figure is what makes the verdict the same from either cell’s page, while the printed percentage stays counted from the cell you are reading about. Cells with identical stored energy share a rank instead of being ordered arbitrarily.

Ranking uses capacity times nominal voltage, because capacity alone is not comparable across chemistries: 150 mAh at 3 V is twice the energy of 150 mAh at 1.5 V. Neighbors are chosen by measurement and never alphabetically, because two cells filed next to each other by name usually have nothing in common. A blank in any table means the maker publishes no figure, which is not the same as zero.

Source: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

Records that disagree behind this page

A27 is assembled from 2 catalog records, and they do not agree with each other on every field. Both sides are numbered below so the disagreement can be read rather than taken on trust.

1. [1] Energizer catalog record 183, active in the snapshot. Technical data sheet: a27z.pdf.
2. [2] Energizer catalog record 703, obsolete in the snapshot. Technical data sheet: a27.pdf.

Every figure above is reproduced from those records without change; the comparisons are ours and are described on the method page. Snapshot: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.

Putting this on a forum or a repair page? The same answer without the site around it — fit, voltage, chemistry and the limits that go with them — is at /embed/a27/. It loads nothing from anywhere else. Paste this:

<iframe src="https://batterycross.com/embed/a27/" width="100%" height="520" loading="lazy" title="A27 replacements"></iframe>