Index / MR41
MR41
MR41 — mercuric oxide, 1.4 V, 7.9 x 3.7 mm. Not listed by Energizer. The closest it still lists: PR41 drops straight in, and runs 1.45 V — +3.6%, a shade high, and it is zinc air, which must breathe.
What fits the compartment, and what does not
Fit answers whether it enters the compartment. Voltage answers whether the circuit will notice. A cell that fits is not always a safe substitute.
| Cell | Fit | Voltage | Chemistry | Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR41 | drop-in | 1.45 V +3.6%close enough | zinc air | — |
| SR41 | drop-in | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 41 mAh |
| 329 | sits lower | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 39 mAh |
| SR59 | sits lower | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 32 mAh |
| SR58 | sits lower | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 27 mAh |
| 341 | sits lower | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 13 mAh |
| 346 | sits lower | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 9.5 mAh |
| PR48 | too tall | 1.45 V +3.6%close enough | zinc air | — |
| SR48 | too tall | 1.55 V +10.7%reads off | silver oxide | 75 mAh |
2 cells drop in and they are not equivalent: of those, SR41 sits furthest at +10.7% of this cell’s 1.4 V, high enough that a calibrated instrument reads above true.
Also stamped 1155M, 325
The axis is the difference from this cell, not a range of volts: the centre is 1.4 V and the ruled middle is the class where a substitute still runs and only reads off — a gap within 20.0% of the higher of the two nominals, which counted from this cell reaches 20.0% below and 25.0% above. One gap, two readings: the other cell’s page prints the other figure for this same pair and lands on the same class. Outside those two rules the class changes. The middle is drawn straight and the outer fifth of each side is compressed, so the +3.6% mark and the +10.7% mark on this track cannot land in the same place.
Unlisted, but something drops straight in
MR41 (also 1155M) has left the Energizer catalog, but the swap is easy: PR41 is the same 7.9 x 3.7 mm and runs at 1.45 V against this cell's 1.4 V. 1 other current cell fits the same slot. The same cell is stamped 1155M and 325 depending on who made it.
What the chemistry changes
Everything above answers size and voltage. What it cannot answer is chemistry, and 2 other kinds are in play here beside the mercuric oxide this cell uses.
- Mercuric oxide held a very flat 1.4 V, which is what old meters were calibrated against. The chemistry is banned for consumer sale in the United States and the European Union, and this site reads one maker's catalog, so what still reproduces that voltage is a question it cannot answer.
- Zinc air takes oxygen from the air through the holes in its face. It starts discharging the moment the tab comes off and runs down in weeks whether the device is used or not, and a sealed compartment starves it.
- Silver oxide holds its voltage almost flat until it is spent, which is why watches and light meters were built around it.
The instruments this cell was calibrated into
Mercuric oxide was chosen for one property: it held its voltage almost flat until it died, so a light meter or an exposure circuit could be calibrated against it and stay calibrated. MR41 is a 1.4 V cell, and the chemistry is banned for consumer sale in the United States and the European Union.
The closest cell in the Energizer data this site reads is PR41 at 1.45 V, which is +3.6% away. On a meter that is not a rounding error, it is the exposure. Zinc air comes closest in voltage and is still made: PR41, PR43 and PR44 run 1.45 V. It is a different envelope and a different discharge life, and it is the direction the photographic trade took.
- A cell that reads off does not announce itself. The needle moves, the numbers look plausible, and the exposure is wrong by a fixed amount every time.
- 9 cells measure close enough to compare against it in the Energizer data this site reads, and 9 of them are still listed.
- The nearest is PR41: it drops straight in and runs 1.45 V, close enough.
- Energizer files it for North America, which is where the part is sold rather than where the cell will work.
Drawn to scale
MR41, side elevation, from the published figures
The same scale for all of them. The dashed line marks the height of MR41: a silhouette that stops short of it will not reach the contact, one that crosses it will not let the cover close.
Every published figure
11 figures are published, and one is not: impedance. The row is absent rather than estimated. It reached shelves as 325.
| Designation | MR41 |
|---|---|
| Also stamped | 1155M, 325 |
| Chemistry | Mercury |
| Nominal voltage | 1.4 V |
| Diameter | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 3.7 mm |
| Weight | 0.9 g |
| Volume | 0.2 cc |
| Capacity | 55 mAh |
| Stored energy | 77 mWh |
| Energy density | 385 mWh per cc |
| In the Energizer catalog | No longer listed |
| Listed for | North America |
2 rows in the table are not the maker's but ours: stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter. Everything else is reproduced without change.
What the datasheet does not say
Beyond size and voltage the sheet for MR41 is thin: 2 published figures below, and no impedance, no cutoff and no operating range at all. That silence is the maker's, not ours.
The part occupies 0.2 cubic centimeters and weighs 0.9 g. Capacity and voltage together put 77 milliwatt-hours in that space. Energizer files it for North America.
- Mass against volume
- 0.9 g filling 0.2 cubic centimeters. When the printing has worn off, a kitchen scale separates two cells of one envelope faster than a caliper does.
- Where the part is filed
- North America. That is a statement about the maker's distribution and not about where the cell works.
Is that a lot of energy?
Nothing else measured shares this shell, so the comparison has to go site-wide: 77 milliwatt-hours in 0.2 cubic centimeters is 385 mWh per cc, denser than 57% of every cell measured here. Density is ours: the maker publishes capacity and volume and never divides one by the other.
A width the catalog keeps returning to
7.9 mm is a width this catalog keeps coming back to: 16 coins sit within half a millimeter of it, MR41 included.
9 of those ones are still listed. Its 385 milliwatt-hours per cubic centimeter sit above 57 percent of everything here that publishes both a capacity and a volume. 14 of the 82 coins share its 1.4 V exactly.
- SR57 — the next step down by volume: 0.19 cubic centimeters against this cell's 0.2.
- SR55 — the next step up: 0.22 cubic centimeters, 110% of this one.
- LR41 — 7.9 x 3.6 mm, 1.5 V, alkaline.
- MR48 — 7.9 x 5.4 mm, 1.4 V, mercuric oxide.
The maker's own part numbers
MR41 carries 2 names beyond the designation, and every one of them is a manufacturer part number: a catalog line, not a size and not a standard.
- 1155M — a manufacturer part number for MR41, not a standard designation.
- 325 — a manufacturer part number for MR41, not a standard designation.
The cell that differs only in depth
The code says the size, so the cells that get confused with MR41 are the ones that keep its diameter and change its depth. 12 cells share this diameter at depths from 1.3 to 5.4 mm, and every one of them enters the same opening.
It stands 1 of 1 in this envelope by stored energy. On a scale the difference shows before it shows on a caliper: this one weighs 0.9 g.
- 346 — same diameter, 1.3 mm tall against this cell's 3.7: 2.4 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
- 341 — same diameter, 1.4 mm tall against this cell's 3.7: 2.3 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
- SR716W — same diameter, 1.6 mm tall against this cell's 3.7: 2.1 mm shallower, which neither designation carries.
- 1157M — 8.9 mm across at 1.4 V against 7.9 mm here, 1 mm apart: too wide to enter in this holder.
- 164 — 6.8 mm across at 1.4 V against 7.9 mm here, 1.1 mm apart: loose in this holder.
What this page cannot tell you
3 of the 7 fields this site reads are empty for MR41: cutoff voltage, impedance and operating temperature. Everything computed from them is absent from this page rather than estimated.
The blanks are the same in all 1 record behind this designation, so they are the catalog's silence and not a merge losing a value. What is not missing is the envelope: 7.9 x 3.7 mm, published and checked against the designation itself.
- No cutoff voltage — so this page cannot tell you what the capacity figure was counted down to, without which the capacity is a number without a scale.
- No impedance — so this page cannot tell you whether the cell can drive a pulse, which is the whole question in a watch or a sensor.
- No operating temperature — so this page cannot tell you whether the maker claims anything at all below freezing.
Before you swap anything
Everything here is computed from published dimensions and nominal voltages. That answers whether a cell enters the compartment and whether the voltage matches on paper. It does not answer what your device does with the difference, and it cannot: a cell that fits can still be the wrong cell.
One more limit, and it is the biggest. This site reads a single manufacturer’s catalog. When a page says a designation is not listed, that means Energizer no longer offers a part under it — not that nobody makes the cell. Other makers may still sell it, and for common sizes they usually do.
A voltage difference is one relation between two cells, and this page prints it from the cell it is about — in every table on the page, including the one listing cells no longer made. A figure always belongs to the cell whose voltage is printed beside it: a cell that runs lower than this one carries a minus here, one that runs higher carries a plus, and two cells at the same nominal voltage carry zero. Meet the same pair on the other cell’s page and the sign is the other one, with the figure taken against that cell instead of this one; where the two run at the same voltage, both pages print zero. The class beside the figure is not read off that figure directly. It is decided on the gap itself, taken against the higher of the two nominal voltages, so one pair of cells gets one class whichever page you meet it on: counted from this side the boundary of the class that still runs falls at 20.0% below and 25.0% above, which is the same gap divided once by the larger nominal and once by the smaller. What genuinely differs between the two directions is the consequence, and the words carry it: a cell that runs low makes a calibrated instrument read below true, and a cell that runs high makes it read above.
3 things this site cannot see. Whether the contacts reach a shorter cell. Whether the device was calibrated for a chemistry that holds its voltage flat, which silver oxide does and alkaline does not. Whether the equipment tolerates the higher current a different chemistry can deliver. Rechargeable cells are never a drop-in for primary cells regardless of size.
Cells measured next to this one
Nothing in this data is this exact size, but the diameter is a well populated one: 12 cells run from 1.3 to 5.4 mm deep, and this cell is one point on that scale.
- 346 — 7.9 x 1.3 mm, 1.55 V
- 341 — 7.9 x 1.4 mm, 1.55 V
- SR716W — 7.9 x 1.6 mm, 1.55 V
- SR58 — 7.9 x 2.1 mm, 1.55 V
Where these numbers come from
Dimensions, voltages, chemistries and capacities are published by the manufacturer and reproduced without change. Everything else on the page is ours, computed from those figures: whether one cell fits where another sat, how far apart their voltages are, stored energy and energy per cubic centimeter, the rank within a shell, and the check of the designation against the measured size.
Fit is decided within 0.3 mm on every axis, which is the order of a contact spring's travel. Voltage classes are decided by consequence, not by roundness, and they are decided on the gap between two nominal voltages taken against the higher of the two: 2.0% or less of it is the same working voltage, 6.0% starts to matter to a calibrated instrument, and past 20.0% it is a different class altogether. Measuring the gap against the higher figure is what makes the verdict the same from either cell’s page, while the printed percentage stays counted from the cell you are reading about. Cells with identical stored energy share a rank instead of being ordered arbitrarily.
Ranking uses capacity times nominal voltage, because capacity alone is not comparable across chemistries: 150 mAh at 3 V is twice the energy of 150 mAh at 1.5 V. Neighbors are chosen by measurement and never alphabetically, because two cells filed next to each other by name usually have nothing in common. A blank in any table means the maker publishes no figure, which is not the same as zero.
Source: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.
The record behind this page
Every figure on this page comes from one catalog record, number 415, and it is linked below. The sheet is the document the dimensions, voltage and capacity were read out of.
- [1] Energizer catalog record 415, listed as 325, obsolete in the snapshot. Technical data sheet: 325.pdf.
Every figure above is reproduced from those records without change; the comparisons are ours and are described on the method page. Snapshot: Energizer technical data, retrieved 1 September 2026.
Putting this on a forum or a repair page? The same answer without the site around it — fit, voltage, chemistry and the limits that go with them — is at /embed/mr41/. It loads nothing from anywhere else. Paste this:
<iframe src="https://batterycross.com/embed/mr41/" width="100%" height="520" loading="lazy" title="MR41 replacements"></iframe>